Archive for January, 2005

January 24th, 2005

A Virus Built For Bloggers?

by Venomous Kate

As a bona fide RSS aggregator addict, I’m always surprised at how many bloggers — and non-bloggers, for that matter — don’t use a news reader. Instead, they visit Google’s news page several times a day or have headlines delivered to their email InBox. Now, the code kiddies are capitalizing on that practice with a virus specifically designed to appeal to those who like email news alerts.

Virus writers have created a worm which poses as breaking news alerts. Crowt-A’s subject line and attachment share the same name, but continually change to mirror the front-page headline on CNN’s website. [...]

Windows users induced into clicking on the infected attachment surrender control of their PCs to crackers. Crowt-A installs a keylogger which captures sensitive data, such as online banking login details, and forwards it to attackers. Infected machines are also turned into relay stations for the worm, spewing copies of it to email addresses harvested from infected PCs.

January 21st, 2005

Hillary Sounds Republican!

by Venomous Kate

Q: How can you tell when a Democrat is positioning for a Presidential bid?
A: They start talking like a Republican.

Saying that religious people should be permitted to “live out their faith in the public square,” Hillary Clinton spent Wednesday night practically pounding the pulpit.

In a speech at a fund-raising dinner for a Boston-based organization that promotes faith-based solutions to social problems, Clinton said there has been a “false division” between faith-based approaches to social problems and respect for the separation of church of state.

“There is no contradiction between support for faith-based initiatives and upholding our constitutional principles,” said Clinton, a New York Democrat who often is mentioned as a possible presidential candidate in 2008.

Addressing a crowd of more than 500, including many religious leaders, at Boston’s Fairmont Copley Plaza, Clinton invoked God more than half a dozen times, at one point declaring, “I’ve always been a praying person.”

Yeah, but praying “God, please don’t let Bill touch me. Please don’t let Bill touch me. Please don’t…” doesn’t really count.

(Link via Drudge.)

January 21st, 2005

Free Stuff!

by Venomous Kate

I love free stuff. I love research. For one week, I get to combine both of my favorite things, thanks to HighBeam’s anniversary next week. The internet-based reference service, which contains more than 32 million documents, is giving away free access (reg. req’d) from January 24 to January 28. Now, all I need is to remember where I put that list of things I’d been wanting to look up at the library.

Link via ResearchBuzz.

January 21st, 2005

The Devil Wears Levis

by Venomous Kate

I bought a couple of skirts yesterday. I love skirts. In fact, one of the many things that I miss about the 80′s was the pairing of skirts with Doc Marten boots, making both fashionable and yet comfortable at the same time.

I didn’t own blue jeans when I met my husband. When you have a hip-to-waist ratio like mine, it’s hard to find a pair that fits right in all the right places. Buy something that fits the hips, and the waist is loose enough to wedge a small child in there. Buy something that fits the waist, and you wind up with a camel-toed look in front and a cloven-hoofed look in the rear… if you can pull them up over your knees, that is.

Skirts with tights were my regular attire until one day when my then-Hubby-to-be suggestted a romantic walk in the woods. One muddy path, one misplaced foot, and one harrowing slide into a briar destroyed the “romance” of our walk. It also convinced me to buy some jeans.

Of course, budgets being what they are, that meant I stopped buying skirts. Soon, my closet featured nothing but jeans. Until yesterday, it still did. There are the size 6 ones I bought shortly after that fateful hike. I keep them around to remind me to try on clothes before leaving the store. One kid, two years of depression and countless Dove Bars later, I now own dozens of jeans ranging from size 8 to size “ate-too-much.”

Recently, I had a crying fit when the latter size stopped fitting. According to the scale, I’d lost six pounds, but my jeans were more snug than ever. I had to lay down and lift my hips, suck in my stomach, and puuuuuulllll to get a pair zipped. I couldn’t quite walk or breathe, but at least I got those suckers on. Unfortunately, I didn’t have a sweater bulky enough to disguise the overage. So, after peeling the jeans off, I drowned my distress in a stiff martini and gave the bathroom scale a good kick.

Two days later, as I laid all of my size “ate-too-much” jeans on the bed in preparation to pack them up for Goodwill, I noticed that a pair of blue jeans was significantly larger than the others. Strange. I recalled the day I bought them. It wasn’t that long ago. I’d liked the way they fit, so I’d also picked up a black pair by the same maker, in the same size. I’d worn the black pair several times — it goes with almost every top I own — but had only worn the blue ones once or twice. Sure enough, when I laid one pair on top of the other, the black jeans were 2 inches narrower and shorter. I hadn’t grown — they’d shrunk!

After performing the requisite happy dance, I apologized to my bathroom scale and resolved to stop putting my jeans in this rental condo’s crummy little apartment-sized dryer. I’d been bitching about the dryer the entire 2 months we’ve been here. It takes 1 hour and 45 minutes to dry a load of regular clothes, and another 30 minutes when the load contains jeans. Don’t know why I hadn’t thought about shrinkage before, but I was sure glad that I hadn’t abandoned my diet. I was also glad for the excuse to go shopping. Mall-walking is good exercise, you know.

At the store yesterday, I couldn’t find any jeans that I liked. It’s that hip-to-waist ratio thing, again. On top of that, “whiskered” jeans are a bit too young-looking, flared legs make me look like I’m melting into the ground, and pleated fronts are so 1990. The only other alternative were jeans made of that lightweight denim-look-alike that’s so flimsy you can’t wear underwear with them but if you go commando, you can’t walk two steps without someone saying “Must be jelly, ‘cuz jam don’t shake like that.” What the hell are department store buyers thinking when they stock women’s departments with crap like that?

So, I decided to buy skirts. I miss wearing them, anyway, and I’ve reached a “certain age” where I can pair them with tights and ankle boots if I want, fashion be damned. I feel prettier in skirts. Getting dressed every day is an event, and I know I’m suitably dressed for everything, aside from spontaneous “romantic” hikes.

Hubby seems to like them, too. I think, after a few years in which the fanciest thing I’ve worn around the house was a pair of embroidered jeans, he’s rather relieved to see that I still have ankles and calves. Besides, I walk differently in skirts. I sit differently, too — more “girly” as he put it last night. When you’re married to a woman with a personality and intellect as assertive as mine, I imagine it’s nice to see her behaving “girly” now and again.

As an added benefit, I can now rest assured that my soul is not damned to the eternal fires of hell. Ah. Form and function!

January 21st, 2005

Reminders

by Venomous Kate

It’s likely to be a short blogging day. I have a staggering list of things to accomplish in preparation for Wednesday’s move to our new house.

But first, two reminders:

1. The Snark Hunt is back and your entries are needed. The deadline is midnight (Central) on Tuesday. This week, with our move scheduled for early the next morning, that deadline is a hard-and-fast one. Find out more about submission requirements here.

2. The Carnival of the Recipes #23 is up at Caltechgirl’s place. Aussie Wife’s Roasted Lemon Bay-Scented Fish sounds absolutely delicious to me! Next week’s Carnival is at Kin’s Kouch, so get those recipes sent to recipe.carnival – at – gmail – dot – com.

January 20th, 2005

Boston Terror List Expands

by Venomous Kate

The FBI has added the names of 10 more Chinese nationals to the list of “persons of interest” believed to be connected to a dirty bomb attack that allegedly targets Boston.

Two law enforcement officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the ongoing investigation, said the names were part of the same anonymous tip that led authorities on Wednesday to announce that they are seeking to question four other Chinese and two Iraqis.

The officials said the tip remains uncorroborated and there is no credible evidence that such a plot exists.

It was unclear why all the names were not announced at the same time. The officials said there was no new information that led to the addition of the 10 names.

Federal authorities say they are no more worried now than they were later.

Still, I have to wonder if any of these 10 names were connected to the Chinese stowaways found in a cargo ship at the Port of Los Angeles last week. Or is that just a coincidence?

January 20th, 2005

Want Some Whine With That?

by Venomous Kate

PETA lost their latest lawsuit. Let them eat cheese.

January 20th, 2005

Write Thinking

by Venomous Kate

Do you think better while typing, or while writing by hand? That’s the question Clive Thompson is asking.

I never write entire pieces of journalism by hand, but I do sometimes make outlines on notepaper. And I’ve noticed distinct differences between the two modes. When I’m thinking about the logical connections between different parts of my argument, for example, I’ll draw big swooping arrows connecting points together — something that can’t be done easily in a word processor. In a word processor, however, I’m able to use the classic DJ-style writing technique — cranking out chunks of text and remixing them via cut-and-paste.

That’s actually been a subject of discussion in the Venomous Household lately. Hubby, you see, is studying for his MBA which, this semester, entails taking both Marketing and Statistics classes after work. I don’t think he’d mind if I told you that he hates school. Always has, always will — and this MBA program is no exception. He’s more comfortable learning in passive mode. (Think: History Channel.)

These days, I’m already over-educated and not interested in going back for more, but I’m still constantly finding new things I want to learn about — computer stuff, herbology, copywriting. With every new thing, I read obsessively on the subject, taking copious notes in the process. As a result, I have filled so many notebooks and index card boxes that I can stock an entire bookshelf with them. Not that I need to refer back to them very often, mind you.

There’s something about physically writing things down that makes them stick in my brain so better than if I merely type notes into a computer. Sure, like Clive mentions, making inferential leaps and reaching those moments of “Aha!” insight happen more often when I’m writing. But there’s more to it than that. It’s as if, because writing is so much slower than typing (I type 120 wpm), my brain has more of an opportunity to mull things over, to absorb them, and to rephrase them in my own words. That last part, I believe, is really essential to learning and grasping new concepts.

I’ve been trying to explain this to Hubby who, despite being mathematically gifted, is struggling with his Statistics class. It’s not just the formulae — his professor doesn’t require students to memorize them — but the concepts behind them. “Take your book notes by hand,” I tell him, but he insists on typing them into the computer which, admittedly, is more legible than his handwriting.

Knowing that husbands quite often mistake their wives’ advice as nagging — and, hence, ignore it — I think I’ll be sharing Clive’s entry and the accompanying NYT article (reg. req’d.) with Hubby tonight after he gets home from class.

But enough about us. How do you learn best: writing by hand, or typing at your keyboard? (And that one-handed typing doesn’t count!)


Switch to our mobile site