Conservapedia: A Conservative Encyclopedia

There’s a new wiki-based encyclopedia on the web, and this one’s for the Right. Conservapedia was created in response to the perceived bias in Wikipedia:

Conservapedia is a much-needed alternative to Wikipedia, which is increasingly anti-Christian and anti-American. On Wikipedia, many of the dates are provided in the anti-Christian “C.E.” instead of “A.D.”, which Conservapedia uses. Christianity receives no credit for the great advances and discoveries it inspired, such as those of the Renaissance.[...]

Conservapedia is an online resource and meeting place where we favor Christianity and America. Conservapedia has easy-to-use indexes to facilitate review of topics. You will much prefer using Conservapedia compared to Wikipedia if you want concise answers free of “political correctness”.

The project was created by a “large, advanced group” of New Jersey homeschoolers in November 2006 — as if I needed another reason to like it!

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!


4 Responses to “Conservapedia: A Conservative Encyclopedia”
Comment by nk
2007-03-03 17:04:06

It will have the same result as Wikipedia. All the litle onanists living in their moms’ basements editing and reverse-editing.

 
Comment by BongoP'o'ndit Subscribed to comments via email
2007-03-06 07:18:17

as if I needed another reason to like it!

Really, and you want your son to learn this truth about “Genes

Although the gene is the fundamental unit of heredity, changes in genes (so-called “evolution”) cannot explain the differences between species, which require an Intelligent Designer
(one among many such examples)

 
Comment by Venomous Kate (admin)
2007-03-06 10:31:18

I’ve got no problem reconciling science with the existence of an Intelligent Designer. I do have a problem with those who believe the two are mutually exclusive.

 
Comment by Steve
2007-03-06 12:55:51

Suffers from a “systematic bias” all its own. Take Conservapedia’s entry on the Theory of Evolution. Biased doesn’t begin to describe it.

In fact, in order to support its bias, it even quotes a book from 1977!

Take a look at the Transitional Vertebrate Fossils FAQ for explanations and descriptions of transitional fossil records.

I find anything that has to CLAIM it isn’t biased, is most definitely the opposite.

I don’t subscribe to the full Theory of Evolution, but I refuse to close my mind to new discoveries all because it doesn’t fit within a narrow view of the universe.

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


    • infidel: I would have bought those ladies a beer if I was ever in England,maybe they will change it back
    • infidel: I lost my @ss in the stocks I had ,I think Im going back to cd’s for a while but I will get hit with...
    • Donna B.: I’m watching one of my currently held stocks drop… the day it shows the slightest bit of upward...
    • lifepundit: He/you did all that in one weekend? It looks like something out of a magazine. Beautiful! You deserve it...
    • lifepundit: Great idea, except for what do you do about the ones that believe their own lies? lifepundits last blog...


Vote McCain and Palin
Vote for real change, not just promises:
Vote McCain and Palin.


follow venomouskate at http://twitter.com



Baby
www.allmums.co.uk - everything you want to know about baby
legal credit repair
ADT Sec System
Mover in Fort Worth
braille exit signs
mobile home financing
floor plans
dish network satellite tv
8mm to DVD
Chelation Therapy
Home Loan
Vehicle Tracking
unique christmas gift ideas
mailing bags
Holidays in New York





WordPress

Copyright © 2003-2008,
Electric Venom.
All rights reserved.