Steve’s last blog post..Government waste

For another: I know plenty of Republicans who are freaks. Political affiliation doesn’t always dictate what gets your rocks off.

If she’d walked into a public location without wearing clothes covering her lower body, she’d be arrested for public indecency.

So what is not lawful for her to do on her own IS lawful for a stranger to force upon her against her will?

Bad law.

According to this ruling a woman wearing a skirt or dress has no right to expect that strangers won’t stick their cameras up her hemline and photograph her panties.

Tell me, last time you wore a skirt/dress did YOU think it would be perfectly acceptable for anyone who felt like it to use their cell phones to photograph your underwear?

Which is mind boggling. Whether she’s at Wal-mart, Target or walking down the street a woman is entitled to expect that strangers have no right to photograph parts of her body that she is attempting to keep covered.

And let us not forget: this is a sixteen year old girl whose crotch was photographed by an adult male against her will. Is that NOT use of a child for sexual gratification?

Mark Eichenlaub’s last blog post..Al Douri documents, suicide bombing attempts with aircraft reveals continued Baath – al Qaeda cooperation