Pit Bull Toddler “Attack” Update
News keeps coming in about the pit bull who allegedly sodomized a toddler. As I’d previously written, Rhonda at StinkyJournalism.org had sent me additional information which indicated the dog may have been trained to mount humans.
Obviously, such training would point to heinous human criminal involvement and explains why the police had inquired about previous acts of aggression. Investigators contacted the dog’s previous owner, who’d had the dog as a puppy before it was taken in by the boy’s family. The owner said there was no prior history of aggression or even biting.
Although the investigation is ongoing, several questions have been repeatedly raised. Where were the boy’s parents at the time of the attack? How would a dog get a diaper off of a toddler without leaving bite marks? And, most of all, is the dog being accused of sodomy that was actually committed by a human?
Via Rhonda again comes this update which addresses many of those questions:
“We’re still plodding through it,” Lockport Police Detective Capt. Larry Eggert said.
Eggert said nothing incriminating was found in the results of DNA tests that were taken from the dog and from the boy.
“If it says dog DNA for both parties, it’s dog DNA, which is pretty much what we were expecting,” he said.
Women’s and Children’s Hospital of Buffalo will not release any information about the boy’s current condition or if he is still a patient there. He underwent surgery there when he was admitted on July 8, the day of the attack.
The boy’s mother told police he had just removed his own dirty diaper and asked her to change him. She said he went into the living room to get a clean diaper and was alone with the dog, a 2-year-old pit bull named Bear, for a matter of minutes when the attack occurred.
The mother heard the boy scream and walked in to see the dog sodomizing him, police said.
Eggert said at the time the boy suffered “some pretty significant injuries” and was expected to undergo reconstructive surgery.
So, while DNA tests rule out a human as the perpetrator of the sodomy, the test results do not rule out human culpability. And the mother certainly has a plausible explanation for why the child was not wearing a diaper at the time of the attack. She is, incidentally, still demanding that the dog — which remains in custody of the SPCA in Niagra County — be put down.
Many of you have left comments indicating that dogs do not act this way of their own accord. I am not a dog owner, but I’m familiar enough with the concept of the “alpha dog” and notions of “pack mentality” to wonder whether such territorial, instinctive behaviour could account for this kind of an attack.
Share your thoughts.
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
I was under the impression that the DNA hadn’t come back yet.
He says “If it says dog DNA for both parties”.
I don’t know about the whole deal…the more I think about it the worse I feel.
The whole situation sucks. (understatement of the century?)
It’s not good any way you look at it. However, I’m probably about to become very unpopular but oh well. Blogs imitate life.
People give animals far more credit than they deserve and tend to anthropomorphize them to a degree that always leaves me unsettled. Animals are animals and can be predictable — they’ll eat, mate, and protect territory as instinctual behavior regardless of how domesticated they are. Why is this so out of character? Who hasn’t had their leg humped and how different is a toddler to a dog that size?
Is it true? I don’t know. I sure hope not. Is it probable? Maybe not. Is it POSSIBLE? It absolutely is and that makes everyone uncomfortable.
I went and read the entire interview. I still can’t believe the dog acted alone. Maybe he was trained to this sort of thing… [huge ew factor!] but the logistics required to tie with a 2year old defy imagination. And is that what really damaged the child??
I have never known a dog to do anything near this, and I’ve been in a hotel room when an intact male Rottie thought that I was going to be his love slave! Thank God I was under the covers at the time, but he STILL wouldn’t have come close to ‘violating’ me. Our bodies and theirs are different.
There are too many questions and too few answers… and now that the family has moved, will we ever know what really happened?
I have owned dogs all my life. I suppose the event described could be initiated by a dog. Typically, this behavior is to demonstrate dominance, like leg humping. Further investigation is warranted. This does not pass the smell test
As a mother of an 18 month old, I can tell you that I would never - no matter if it were the family pet or not - leave him unattended with an animal such as that one. In fact, I would have a problem with ANY dog, but a Pitt? NO F’N WAY. (I don’t want to hear about how it’s the owners not the dogs, yadda yadda. This is my BABY we’re talking about.)
And yes. Definitely, there is something rotten in this story, somewhere.
Yeah, I can’t fathom leaving a toddler with a large dog, either. When my son was that age, we had a mini-Dachshund and a Cocker Spaniel — neither are large breeds. We’d had them for years and considered them to be gentle dogs.
But they never, EVER got to be alone with my son. Period.