Posts tagged ‘Barack Obama’

October 22nd, 2008

It’s Too Late To Fix McCain’s Message

by Venomous Kate

Writing about a “Reverse-Bradley effect“, Kathleen Parker explains in today’s WaPo that many Republicans, who’ve grown disgusted with McCain’s campaign, are secretly planning to vote for Obama instead.

I’ve received too many e-mails and had too many conversations that began, “Just between you and me,” and ended with, “I wouldn’t want anyone at work to know,” to believe that this is an insignificant trend.

Indeed, it’s a definite possibility. I know. I’ve found myself on more than one occasion wondering just what McCain’s offering, what kind of message he’s trying to send with his snap-decisions to suspend his campaign one day and pussyfooting around the financial crisis the next.

I’ve even toyed with the idea, suggested by Will Wallace here, to stay home on election day to punish the Republican party for having chosen McCain as their candidate. But I like to bitch, and unless I cast my vote I don’t see that I’ve got much right to do so. Still, the idea is a tempting one, given the pitiful campaign that John McCain has run after having miraculously been named his party’s nominee.

And by “miraculous”, I mean that: just over four years ago, after scoring the Democratic presidential nomination, John Kerry had one name at the top of his list of prospective running mates: Arizona Senator John McCain. McCain has consistently denied such overtures were made, much less considered.

Yet the rumor’s persistence points to one of the greatest weaknesses in McCain’s bid for the White House: he is too liberal to be a conservative, and too conservative to be a liberal. This, he contends, is part of what makes him a Maverick. Yet his downfall may stem from his inability to craft and convey a message that appeals to either side.

With 26 years of Washington experience, John McCain also has a record that does not sit well with his own party’s primary base. Between his positions on illegal immigration, Roe v. Wade and his opposition to the Bush Administration’s treatment of terrorist detainees, few top conservatives favored him as the nominee.

As a result, John McCain has had to run a campaign in which he’s wooing not only undecided and independent voters, but voters from within the Republican party, too. Yet he appears to be failing in both regards. McCain’s 8 point mid-October poll deficit (which now may be as high as 10 points) has only been overcome by one candidate in the past 50 years: Ronald Reagan. But John McCain is no Ronald Reagan: he lacks the charisma, the personality and, most importantly, the support of the religious right.

For a time, it appeared as if Sarah Palin’s nomination as Vice President would address McCain’s shortcomings. As a Bible-thumping, pro-life Mom in favor of gun ownership, Palin not only appealed to the far right within the Republican party, but to disenfranchised Hillary Clinton supporters as well.

With McCain’s failure to address the issues of concern to many Americans (hint: it’s about the economy, stupid), he’s frittered away the post-convention bump in the polls she delivered. Top conservative pundits, already fleeing the GOP after Palin’s nomination, are now being joined by Florida seniors and blue-collar white women, both previously considered solid voting blocs for McCain.

Meanwhile, McCain’s messy message has failed to appeal to independent and undecided voters. In fact, his dogged insistence on attacking Obama actually played into Democrats hands, providing the Senator from Illinois an opportunity to score with voters as he pointed out what McCain’s own campaign just doesn’t get:

“With the economy in turmoil and the American Dream at risk, the American people don’t want to hear politicians attack each other… You want to hear about how we’re going to attack the challenges facing the middle class each and every day.”

While there are plenty of reasons to attack Obama — his ties to an unrepentant racist, to an unrepentant domestic terrorist, and to unrepentant racketeer and felon come to mind, as does his posturing as a working class stiff when he’s anything but one. Yet the time for those attacks had long since passed. Still, even as voters turned against McCain, his campaign remained in the “attack, attack, attack” mode described by Joe Biden.

Ignoring his slip in the polls like the “Maverick” he claims to be, McCain continues to run those very ads, most recently trotting out — at long last — the “Blind Ambition” ad tying Obama with William Ayers… an ad which nevertheless ignores Obama’s ties to Ayers’ wife, the likely head of the terrorist group The Weather Underground. But that move may have only reinforced McCain’s biggest weakness among independent and undecided voters: his image as a petty, mean-spirited man – a character depiction that has haunted McCain throughout this race.

For all its virulence, McCain’s attack strategy did nothing to take advantage of his post-convention bump, nor has it since done anything to distinguish the candidate from President Bush, whom a majority of Americans — from both parties — blame for the economy’s troubles.

“Either McCain wins the argument over the economy or he loses,” said Newt Gingrich, the former Republican Speaker of the House. “When the economy is this central to everybody’s life, when everybody is as worried as they are now, then when you are not talking about the economy you are not winning.”

For every opportunity he has to talk about the economy in solid, clear-cut terms, McCain backs off, hesitating to go for the knockout with a clearly honed explanation of the pitfalls behind Obama’s “share the wealth” plan. Nor has he made much effort to elaborate on why Obama cannot keep his promise to cut taxes and implement his costly policies, and the obvious conclusion: one of those promises must be a lie.

Meanwhile, McCain’s choices have cost him the media’s attention as well. Until recently he’d continued an inexplicable and self-indulgent policy of taking entire weekends off. As a result, in the five weeks leading up to the final debate, team Obama (consisting of the candidate, his wife, and vice-presidential nominee Joe Biden), separately appeared at 95 political events in battleground states.

During that same period, McCain’s camp made a mere 55 stops. The result somewhat accounts for the imbalance in media reporting: more newsworthy events get more press coverage. Add to that the increased exposure Obama’s TV ads that are outnumbering McCain’s 3 to 1 — not including his recent purchase of a half-hour of prime time television on Oct. 29 — and it’s easy to understand why McCain has now decided to cast himself as the underdog.

But if he is an underdog, it’s due to his own campaign choices. Why continue to focus on Obama’s curious and questionable friends and alliances when it’s obviously not playing well with voters? Why hammer on the message of dangerous inexperience when the polls clearly show people are more interested in policy? Is McCain so disengaged with his own party’s platform that he can’t portray himself otherwise — too conservative to be a liberal, and too liberal to be a conservative?

Yes, I’ll be casting a vote for McCain but by doing so I’m not so much voting for him as I’m voting against Obama. And just as WaPo’s Kathleen Parker advises Obama that he shouldn’t take a victory on his part as a mandate so much as a vote against McCain, I’d hope McCain realizes the reverse is true, too. If he wins it won’t be on the basis of a well-run campaign; it will simply be because he’s not that one.

October 14th, 2008

What’s Obama Hiding?

by Venomous Kate

The list of Obama’s records that are “not available” continues to grow.

October 9th, 2008

Obama And The Issue Of Race

by Venomous Kate

My latest column, Maybe Some Of It Is About Race, After All is up at Pajamas Media.

October 7th, 2008

An Open Letter To John McCain

by Venomous Kate

Dear Senator McCain,

Considering your now-infamous admission that you don’t know how to use a computer, it might seem foolish for me to post this online. I like to think that even if you don’t spend much time reading blogs, perhaps your staff does. Goodness knows, with your insistence on taking off every weekend throughout the campaign they’ve probably had more time on their hands than any election staff in history.

As for tonight’s debate, I’m sure you’ve already memorized your talking points, and perhaps you’ve even brushed up on some of the snarkier jabs you plan to take at Senator Obama. Given tonight’s town hall format, a style at which you ordinarily excel, perhaps you’re concentrating on stress-reduction ahead of the event, maybe with a latte from Starbucks, one of the beers you didn’t veto, or perhaps just a nice facial.

But know this, Senator: you’re slipping. No, let me phrase that more accurately: you’re plunging, and you’re doing it so rapidly that the sucking sound left in your wake is drowning out whatever message you think you’re delivering.

That’s the thing, Senator: right now you don’t seem to actually have a message. Oh, we hear plenty of attacks on Obama, about his ties to domestic terrorist William Ayers…although, inexplicably, you haven’t said much about his link with corrupt financier Tony Rezko. You’ve inundated us for months with ads and speeches calling Obama dishonorable and questioning whether Obama lacks the judgment to lead. If the election went to the best character assassin, you’d win by a landslide.

But we both know that’s not what it takes to win. Or at least, I do. Lately, I’m starting to wonder if that’s true of you, Senator McCain. And, truth be told, after the last 8 years of living with a president whose head was so firmly buried up his ass (or Cheney’s or Rumsfeld’s… hard to say), there are plenty of people, including registered Republicans like me, who are starting to wonder whether you’re paying attention to what’s happening outside the confines of your campaign bus.

To quote Bill Clinton, “It’s the economy, stupid.”

It sucks — every day brings more dire news about the Dow plunging and the Fed having to take radical steps to stimulate the credit market. Yet just three weeks ago you were assuring us that the economy’s doing fine. Oh, I know you wish you could take that back now, but you can’t unring a bell. The problem is, Senator, ever since that gaffe you seem determined to avoid addressing the country’s economic problems at all.

That, Sir, is precisely what you must do tonight: tell us how you’re going to fix it.

Tell us why you’re not part of the problem.

Tell us how you are different than George W. Bush, and lay out for us in specific terms how your policies would work. Don’t give us more unspecific talk about being a “maverick” – at this stage in the campaign, with both you and Sen. O on the attack — you could prove yourself a true maverick by offering clear solutions, not simply more finger-pointing and sound bytes.

Tell us how you’re going to put more money into our pockets with tax cuts, how you’re going to turn the country’s economic situation around, and how you’ll keep us from ever getting into this kind of mess again.

Don’t tell us what Obama can’t do, Senator. Tell us what you will do. Anything less is just a waste of our time.

Warm regards,
VK

September 23rd, 2008

A Biden-Clinton October Swap? Not Likely.

by Venomous Kate

We knew McCain’s masterful chess move of adding Palin to the ticket would cause Obama’s camp to have conniption fits. Between the anti-Palin media bias, the racism disguised as threats against her, the hacked email — they’re afraid. Very afraid.

But afraid enough to dump Biden from the ticket under the guise of poor health as some bloggers thinks the Dems are planning in early October?

It’s quite a stretch to point to the lack of Obama-Biden merchandise as proof the Big O plans to dump Joe. More likely it’s just further proof that Obama doesn’t want to keep reminding his voting base that part of his plan for change and proof he’s ready to lead involve partnering with a long-time Washington insider whose experience dwarfs Obama’s own. And then there’s that whole “sounds like” issue.

Sure, Biden’s health is of concern: the man had two surgeries to remove brain aneurysms… twenty years ago. I suppose it’s possible, as some suggest, that Biden will suddenly take a turn for the worse next month, allowing Hillary to come riding to the rescue as the antidote to Palinmania. And perhaps the assurances that Hillary didn’t really want to be VP, made by Bill Clinton on The View yesterday, were designed to deflect.

But if an early October Biden-Clinton swap does occur, think about what it does to the objections and attacks Dems have been making since Palin landed on the GOP ticket.

Clinton supporters were angry when Obama first passed over Hillary in favor of Biden. How satisfied would they really be knowing that her presence on the ticket was just a hefty helping of sloppy seconds? Sure, they might vote based on getting Hillary into office, but if that’s how Obama gets into the White House he’d have to watch his back. (Clinton didn’t refer to Robert Kennedy’s assassination earlier without reason, after all, and as we all know John Kennedy died in office.)

Most of all, consider what it would mean if Obama’s poll ratings soared in the wake of a Biden-Clinton switch? It means he should have had Clinton on the ticket in the first place, but that he didn’t exercise good judgment. Which would make a Biden-Clinton switch not only a sham for covering up the consequences of his mistake, but pretty much prove exactly what the GOP has been saying about him all along: he lacks the judgment to lead. Being led by polls and the likelihood of losing? Nope, sorry, that doesn’t count.

When McCain nominated Palin to appeal to female voters, Dems — seeing it as a statement that women are interchangeable — angrily demanded: “How dumb do you think we are?”

If there’s a “health problem” that leads Biden-Clinton swap come early October, I think we can all assume it means Obama’s answer is: very.

September 8th, 2008

An “Oops” Or Obama Outing Himself As Muslim?

by Venomous Kate

We all know what a Freudian slip is. All of us except Barack Obama, that is. His slip in an interview with George Stephanopolous yesterday involved a huge slip – one that ought to land him a lot of hot water because it sure seems like he just admitted to being a Muslim.

In an interview Sunday with ABC’s “This Week” host George Stephanopoulos, Obama tried to suggest that FOX News and others “closely allied” to Republicans are promulgating the notion that the Illinois senator is Muslim.

Asked about whether McCain himself has done anything to suggest he’s Muslim, Obama said, “Let’s not play games. What I was suggesting — you’re absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith. And you’re absolutely right that that has not come…”

“Christian faith,” Stephanopoulos interrupted, correcting Obama.

“… my Christian faith. Well, what I’m saying is that he hasn’t suggested that I’m a Muslim. And I think that his campaign’s upper echelons have not, either. What I think is fair to say is that, coming out of the Republican camp, there have been efforts to suggest that perhaps I’m not who I say I am when it comes to my faith, something which I find deeply offensive, and that has been going on for a pretty long time,” Obama said.

Sure, when reading it things sound like he might (just might, mind you) have accidentally misspoken. But when you listen to him talking, it’s the “my Christian faith” part that sounds like the part he was trying not to say.

Naturally, Obama says it’s a gaffe and has called news outlets printing the story “irresponsible”. But really, Senator Barack, who is the irresponsible one, here: the media, for letting the American public know that a presidential candidate can’t seem to keep the facts about himself straight, or the presidential candidate who keeps doing it?

August 26th, 2008

The Ayers Ad Obama Doesn’t Want You To See

by Venomous Kate

If Obama‘s, and now Biden‘s, ties to convicted fraudulent fundraiser Tony Rezko weren’t enough to show that whatever “experience” Obama might have it’s not the kind we need in Washington, the “candidate of change’s” ties to a domestic terrorist should make that point perfectly clear.

Only problem is, if you aren’t plugged in to the internet you might never hear about those ties because Obama’s campaign has launched a letter-writing campaign to stop television networks from airing the ad while calling for the DOJ to investigate the PAC behind it. (.pdf file)

Here’s the ad they don’t want you to see:

If this is how Obama treats the right to free speech of those who oppose him while he’s campaigning, what should we expect if he does get elected?

As Michelle Malkin asked: “Will they come after bloggers next?” Unfortunately, it appears the answer is YES: self-described “anarchists” at the DNC are calling for Malkin’s death as I type this.

H/T to Glenn for the video.

UPDATE: More from Jonah Goldberg:

But it runs even deeper than you might think. Consider Bernadine Dohrn, Ayers’ wife and the co-host of Obama’s career-launching fundraiser. When she was in the Weather Underground she was one of those members typically fascinated with Charles Manson (I discuss this briefly in my book). Speaking of Manson’s famous murders she exclaimed, “Dig It! First they killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them, they even shoved a fork into a victim’s stomach! Wild!” In appreciation, her Weather Underground cell made a threefingered “fork” gesture its official salute.

UPDATE TWO: Read the American Issues Project’s response pointing out that if the DOJ investigates conservative groups and their donors, as Obama’s letter called for, then similar investigations should be carried out on liberal groups and their supporters, too.

August 26th, 2008

The Biden Gaffe Factory Is Now Open!

by Venomous Kate

Snagged this from Baldilocks who’s right: this is going to be a fun few months.